Home > Security Channel Tips > Security Channel Issues & Commentary > 'White hot' security markets: A gift or curse?
Security Channel Tips:
EMAIL THIS
 TIPS & NEWSLETTERS TOPICS 

SECURITY CHANNEL ISSUES & COMMENTARY

'White hot' security markets: A gift or curse?


Mike Rothman
08.21.2007
Rating: --- (out of 5)


Security Channel Update
Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google


Back when I was on the manufacturer side, my buddies and I thought how green the grass is for VARs. You get to profit and benefit from any hot security market, while the vendors have to actually push the rock up the mountain and build the market. Oh, the humanity!

If it were only that easy, right? On the positive side, security VARs do get to pick and choose which markets to focus on. But all that glitters is not gold and "white hot" security markets like network access control (NAC) and data leak prevention (DLP) bring as many difficulties as they do benefits. You know the kind of markets I'm talking about – the press is all over them, new vendors are coming out of the woodwork with better, bigger, faster products, and the quantitative analysts project a billion percent growth over the next three years.

When the hype cycle gets this crazy, part of me wants to go sit in on an island until the dust settles. But that's not the best course of action if you're a VAR. Let's take a look at the pros and cons of white hot security markets and how you can minimize your risk while navigating them.

Since I'm trying very hard to be an optimistic type, let's first look at the benefits of playing in a hype-ridden market. It's true that there's a lot of good news relative to not having to evangelize a technology to your customers. They are likely already talking about it. In most cases, they'll ask you for your opinion about the new products.

These customers are also usually willing to kick the tires a lot more readily. A new NAC box that promises to do everything for everyone? Sure, bring it on by. Try that with a less exciting product like biometrics (with a suspect value proposition) or the new antivirus (a commodity). Right, you thought salmon swimming upstream had it tough. So, given the difficulties in getting any attention from customers nowadays, this isn't a bad thing.

Additionally, early markets drive a lot of service opportunities. It's mature enough to be beyond the really early adopters, but not to have the deployment model totally worked out. This creates significant revenue opportunities for VARs.

Given my cynical nature, it's usually a lot easier for me to point out why even a very hot security market can be challenging to navigate. The first and most significant issue is that of confusion. In a fast moving, faster growing market, everyone wants a piece. So one day you have one or two vendors doing the yeoman's work of building the market. The next day you have 15 vendors telling exactly the same story and confusing customers.

Next, the competition of having an early market being picked over by 15 vendors is brutal. All the vendors sound the same and perceived differentiation disappears overnight. Let's jump into the time machine and remember the antispam market. It seems like over night 40 vendors appeared spouting the same cocktail of detection techniques and bigger, faster boxes. VARs ended up having to spend a lot of time tracking the market just to stay on top of the disinformation being spread by less-than-savory manufacturers. I've been there. It's no fun.

Don't forget that what giveth can also taketh away. Since the products are not mature enough to work well, there are service opportunities. But this also makes evaluations and bake-offs very problematic. In fast moving markets, most customers want to do a bake-off, and the ones trained well in the art of buying security products don't like to pay for evals. That's as fun as a root canal.

So what do you do? Do you just wait for the market to mature and become less complicated? You can, but you may miss out on the high-margin product and service opportunities that are characteristic of early markets. So this isn't really an option, given your role as a trusted advisor to the customers.

That being said, it makes more sense to tread slowly. That means you pick one manufacturer initially and get smart on their technology. It won't be clear whether the vendor you choose will make it or whether the market will even happen. This forces you to make strategic bets all over the place. But it's better to pick one vendor and roll the dice, than pick them all and burn up a lot of time in a market that doesn't happen (PKI anyone?).

Once the market matures a bit and market leaders emerge, then you can expand your line card. Much of your market knowledge will be directly applicable to the other vendors. But to bet too early on a specific market is asking for trouble.

Given that there will be multiple manufacturers to choose from, how do you pick the good ones from the bad ones? That takes a bit of good, old-fashioned research. You probably know the early sales staff of at least some of the vendors because you've been to the dance before and the same folks keep showing up with new business cards. So that's a start.

Look for other signs of early momentum. Make sure the management team has done it before -- especially with the channel. Other favorable signs are the backing of top-tier VCs and a decent amount of marketing activity. But it's a balance. It's bad if they spend so much on marketing they fly into the mountain. But it's also bad if they don't spend anything and expect you to build the market for them.

And yes, over time there will be consolidation and at least some of the partners on your line card will have new business cards and pockets overflowing with acquisition money. Make them buy dinner. The good news is dealing with consolidation is a known process.

Running the risk that I'll sound like a broken record, the last bit of advice I'll give is to ALWAYS stay focused on the customer. Even if it's a hot market, if it's not going to add value to the customer – wait it out. Even if you have a bunch of vendors chasing you to talk about their fancy new widget, it's not worth alienating long-standing customers to move a few boxes – even if you could.

About the author
Mike Rothman is president and principal analyst of Security Incite, an industry analyst firm in Atlanta, and the author of
The Pragmatic CSO: 12 Steps to Being a Security Master. Get more information about the Pragmatic CSO at http://www.pragmaticcso.com, read his blog at http://blog.securityincite.com, or reach him via e-mail at mike.rothman (at) securityincite (dot) com.


Rate this Tip
To rate tips, you must be a member of SearchSecurityChannel.com.
Register now to start rating these tips. Log in if you are already a member.




Digg This!    StumbleUpon Toolbar StumbleUpon    Bookmark with Delicious Del.icio.us    Add to Google



RELATED CONTENT
Security Channel Issues & Commentary
Top security channel tips and topics for 2009
How to help customers write effective security RFPs
The pros and cons of offering specialized security services
PCI compliance: Web application firewall vs. code review
How to leverage integrated security and storage
Making the most of selling antivirus services
Should VARs embrace the monoculture?
How to recession-proof your information security business
Top five security service provider tips of 2007
How to maintain healthy relationships with small security vendors

Security solution provider business management
Managed security service provider guide
Microsoft-IBM competition fuels SMB, midmarket channel opportunities
How channel partners can profit from security vendor consolidation
EMC announces enhanced partner program
McAfee and Extreme Networks partner for secure networking
Zecurion launches new channel partner program
SonicWall to offer cloud-based antispam service
Microsoft Partner Network allows for better customer relationships
MSPAlliance accreditation programs vet managed services firms and practitioners
Survey: Financial services sector may soon start spending on security

More information on data leak prevention
How do I determine the right number of security vendor partners?
Data leak prevention strategies for security service providers

RELATED RESOURCES
2020software.com, trial software downloads for accounting software, ERP software, CRM software and business software systems
Search Bitpipe.com for the latest white papers and business webcasts
Whatis.com, the online computer dictionary

DISCLAIMER: Our Tips Exchange is a forum for you to share technical advice and expertise with your peers and to learn from other enterprise IT professionals. TechTarget provides the infrastructure to facilitate this sharing of information. However, we cannot guarantee the accuracy or validity of the material submitted. You agree that your use of the Ask The Expert services and your reliance on any questions, answers, information or other materials received through this Web site is at your own risk.

HomeNewsTopicsITKnowledge ExchangeTipsMultimediaWhite PapersBlogsEvents
About Us  |  Contact Us  |  For Advertisers  |  For Business Partners  |  Site Index  |  RSS
SEARCH 
TechTarget provides technology professionals with the information they need to perform their jobs - from developing strategy, to making cost-effective purchase decisions and managing their organizations' technology projects - with its network of technology-specific websites, events and online magazines.

TechTarget Corporate Web Site  |  Media Kits  |  Site Map




All Rights Reserved, Copyright 2006 - 2010, TechTarget | Read our Privacy Policy
  TechTarget - The IT Media ROI Experts